Makarieva A.M., Gorshkov V.G., Nobre A.D., Nefiodov A.V., Sheil D., Nobre P., Li B.-L. (2019) Comments on "Is condensation-induced atmospheric dynamics a new theory of the origin of the winds?". Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 76, 2181-2185. A full version is here: arXiv:1809.01874 [physics.ao-ph] Our reply to the reply to our comments will be published here soon
Abstract
Here we respond to Jaramillo et al.'s recent critique of condensation-induced atmospheric dynamics (CIAD). We show that CIAD is consistent with Newton's laws while Jaramillo et al.'s analysis is invalid. To address implied objections we explain our different formulations of "evaporative force". The essential concept of CIAD is condensation's role in powering atmospheric circulation. We briefly highlight why this concept is necessary and useful.

Макарьева А.М., Горшков В.Г., Нобре А.Д., Нефёдов А.В., Шейл Д., Нобре П., Ли Б.-Л. (2019) Комментарии к работе "Является ли конденсационная динамика новой теорией происхождения ветров?". Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 76, 2181-2185. [на англ. яз.] Полная версия здесь: arXiv:1809.01874 [physics.ao-ph] Наш ответ на ответ на комментарии будет опубликован здесь в ближайшем времени
Аннотация
Here we respond to Jaramillo et al.'s recent critique of condensation-induced atmospheric dynamics (CIAD). We show that CIAD is consistent with Newton's laws while Jaramillo et al.'s analysis is invalid. To address implied objections we explain our different formulations of "evaporative force". The essential concept of CIAD is condensation's role in powering atmospheric circulation. We briefly highlight why this concept is necessary and useful.